During the Period of Greek Art an Architectural Format Was Developed

Greek Sculpture Made Unproblematic
History, Timeline, Characteristics of Statues, Reliefs From Ancient Greece.
MAIN A-Z INDEX

The Farnese Heracles (5th Century)
Museo Archeologico Nazionale,
Naples. A Roman copy of the
sculpture by Lysippos.
Notice the muscle-detail and
natural-looking stance.

Note Virtually Art Evaluation
In order to appreciate three-D fine art
from ancient Greece, see:
How to Appreciate Sculpture.
For later on works, see:
How to Appreciate Modern Sculpture.

Where Did Greek Sculpture Come From?

Greek fine art of classical antiquity is believed to be a mixture of Egyptian, Syrian, Minoan (Crete), Mycenean and Farsi cultures - which (judging by language) are themselves derived from Indo-European tribes migrating from the open up steppes north of the Blackness Sea. Greek sculptors learned both stone carving and bronze-casting from the Egyptians and Syrians, while the traditions of sculpture within Hellenic republic were adult by the two main groups of settlers from Thessaly - the Ionians and Dorians. (For more well-nigh stone masonry in Ancient Egypt, see: Egyptian Architecture.)

What is the Timeline of Greek Sculpture?

The chronology of sculpture in Ancient Hellenic republic is traditionally divided into three master periods:

• The Primitive Catamenia (c.650-500 BCE)
Greek sculptors showtime to develop monumental marble sculpture.
• The Classical Period (c.500-323 BCE)
The creative highpoint of Greek sculpture
• The Hellenistic Catamenia (c.323-27 BCE)
The "Greek" way of 3-D fine art is practiced across the Eastern Mediterranean.

[Notation: For information about ceramic art, including the Geometric, Black-figure, Blood-red-figure and White-basis technique, delight come across: Greek Pottery: History & Styles.]

Apollo Belvedere (330) by Leochares
Museo Pio Clementino, Rome.
Of a sudden Greek sculpture is
utterly life-similar.

Doryphorus (440) past Polykleitos.
Museo Archeologico Nazionale,
Naples. Ane of the great
works of Greek civilization - note
the contrapposto stance, creating
tense and relaxed parts of the
body on opposite sides.

What is the History of Early on Greek Sculpture?

Bone and ivory carving had been produced in Arab republic of egypt since about v,000 BCE, as part of cultural traditions established during the late Rock Age (ten,000-5,000 BCE). And then, from 2,600 BCE onwards, came various strands of Aegean art, notably Minoan civilization on Crete, with its stone sculpture (notably seal stones), fresco painting, ceramics and metalwork. Following a serial of earthquakes, Minoan culture complanate around 1425 BCE, and the mainland-based Mycenean fine art became the dominant type of Greek civilization - known for its ceramic pottery, carved gemstones and glass ornaments - until about 1150 BCE, when they too were taken over - this time by invading Dorians. After this came the Greek "Night Ages" - a 400-twelvemonth period of chaos and fighting, when fiddling if whatsoever art was produced. During the calmer 8th century BCE, still, a new civilisation of visual fine art began to emerge, involving pottery and some painting and sculpture, while Homer's Iliad and The Odyssey were besides written around this time. However, sculptural development remained extremely slow until the Archaic Period (c.600-500 BCE). For more about the earliest Archaic styles, see: Daedalic Greek Sculpture (650-600). For a wider catenary, see: Etruscan Art (c.700-xc BCE).

Was Greek Sculpture Primarily Religious?

Yes. During the Primitive and Classical periods, most of import Greek sculpture was of a religious character, fabricated for temples which were usually defended to a single divinity. Divine statues were sculpted in the likeness of man, and were fabricated in various materials and sizes. Other votive statues stood inside and outside the temple as well as urns, images of sacred animals, and other objects of a sculptural nature.

Why did Greek Sculpture develop more rapidly in the Archaic Flow?

A key feature of the Archaic flow was the renewal of commercial contacts and maritime merchandise links between Greece and the Eye East (especially Egypt, as well as the metropolis-states of Asia Minor), which inspired Greek artists to begin establishing a tradition of monumental marble sculpture. In addition, information technology was during the Archaic era that the Greeks began using stone for their public buildings, and started to develop their three Orders of Compages (Doric, Ionic and Corinthian), each comprising a column, with a base, shaft, capital, and entablature with Architrave frieze, and cornice. Most importantly, it was during this period that the Greek rock temple attained its essential form, allowing for plenty of architectural sculpture, including: reliefs and friezes on the temple'southward pediments (the triangular gable under the roof of a edifice) and metopes (the rectangular panels to a higher place the colums), also equally statues of all kinds. It's worth bearing in mind that the history of sculpture shows a articulate correlation betwixt compages and plastic art: the more buildings that are constructed, the more than sculptures are needed. This occurred in Classical Artifact, and too in Medieval sculpture (Romanesque/Gothic), Renaissance sculpture (Early on and High), Bizarre Sculpture (17th century) and Neoclassical sculpture (18th century).

What are the Characteristics of Archaic Greek Sculpture?

In full general, during this flow, Greek sculptors made friezes and reliefs of varying sizes (in stone, terracotta and forest), as well equally many different types of statue (in rock, terra cotta and statuary), and miniature sculptures (in ivory, bone and metallic). Archaic complimentary-standing figures accept the solid mass and frontal opinion of Egyptian models, but their forms are more dynamic: see, for instance, the Torso of Hera (660–580, Louvre).

From about 620, the three about common statues were the standing nude youth ( kouros , plural kouroi ), the standing draped girl ( kore , plural korai ), and the seated woman. (The kouros remained popular until nearly 460.) To begin with, these figurative works - similar most other gratuitous-continuing Greek sculptures from the Primitive era - resembled Egyptian statues in both shape and posture (frontal, wide-shouldered, narrow-waisted, arms hanging shut to body, fists clenched and both feet on the ground, left-foot slightly advanced, facial expression limited to a fixed "archaic smile"). However, as Greek appreciation of homo anatomy improved, these kouroi and korai became less rigid and artificial-looking, and more truthful-to-life, whereas Egyptian sculptors adhered strictly to the rigid hieratic designs laid down by their cultural authorities.

Another distinctly Greek feature was that, different Egyptian figures, the kouroi had no explicit religious purpose: they might be used as commemorative markers or tombstones, or votive statues, or to portray local heroes similar athletes, or to represent the God Apollo or Heracles. The Greeks had long decided that the homo body was the most important subject for any creative person, and since they gave their Gods human being grade, they made no distinction between the sacred and the secular. Too, kouroi were nude, while Egyptian male figures were shown clothed.

The female statue, the kore, was seen as less important. In its cosmos, Archaic sculptors focused mainly on proportion and the blueprint of curtain, rather than physical anatomy. Ionian artists were the best at depicting the folds of the loosely draped dress (chiton) and overmantle (himation). Almost korai were votive sculptures, standing equally dedications in sanctuaries, such as the Acropolis in Athens.

What are the Most Famous Greek Statues from the Primitive Period?

Famous examples of Archaic Greek Sculpture include:

- Kleobis and Biton (610-580 BCE) Archeological Museum of Delphi
- Kouros (c.600) Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York
- The Strangford Apollo of Anafi (c.600-580) British Museum, London
- The Dipylon Kouros (c.600) Athens, Kerameikos Museum
- The Moschophoros or Dogie-bearer (c.570) Acropolis Museum, Athens
- The Anavysos Kouros (c.525) National Archeological Museum of Athens
- Frieze of the Siphnian Treasury, Delphi (c.525) Archeological Museum, Delphi

To see how Greek designs avant-garde, compare, for instance, the limestone statue Lady of Auxerre (c.630 BCE, Louvre, Paris), with the "Peplos Kore" (c.530, Acropolis Museum, Athens); compare besides, the Sounion Kouros (c.600, National Archeological Museum of Athens), with the "Kritios Boy" (490-480, Acropolis Museum, Athens).

What Materials did Greek Sculptors Use?

The nearly popular sculptural materials used in Aboriginal Hellenic republic included: marble and other calcareous rock, bronze, terracotta and woods. Information technology is worth noting that about half of all statues created during artifact were made of statuary, despite the fact that the metal was simply used widely in sculpture from about 550-500 onwards. Whatever textile was used, the last surface of the statue was made to look more life-like by beingness coated with oil and hot wax, before being coloured and gilded. Even relief sculpture was not considered finished until polished and coloured.

Were Greek Sculptures Painted?

Generally, Yes. Whether fabricated from marble, bronze, wood, terracotta or metallic, well-nigh Greek sculptures (statues and reliefs) were painted in polychrome. Amazingly, this primal characteristic was largely dismissed for several centuries due to the prejudices of influential fine art historians like the Neoclassical expert Johann Joachim Winckelmann (1717-68), who remained resolutely opposed to the very idea of "painted" Greek sculpture. Information technology wasn't until the German archeologist Vinzenz Brinkmann recently proved that the entire Parthenon was in fact painted, that the colouring of ancient Greek sculptures was accustomed equally fact. See also: Archaic Greek Painting (c.625-500).

What Happened to Greek Sculpture During the Classical Period?

The Classical period witnessed a rapid improvement in Greek statuary. There was a dramatic rise in the technical skills of Greek sculptors in their ability to depict the human torso in a relaxed rather than rigid posture. Classicism improved on the rigidity of the Primitive idiom and brought a more natural sense of motion and amount to the human being figure, every bit exemplified, for instance, in the metopes and pediments of the Temple of Zeus at Olympia. Also, bronze became the predominant medium for monumental free-standing statues, non least considering of the metal's ability to agree its shape - no matter how complex - which enabled the cosmos of less rigid poses. As well as being stronger and lighter, a bronze figure could exist stabilized by placing lead weights within its hollow feet. This permitted the creation of new poses, which, if sculpted in marble, would take caused the statue to fall over. Unfortunately, bronze was so important for the creation of weapons, and so piece of cake to melt downwards, that well-nigh Greek statuary statues have vanished, making it hard to properly capeesh the Greek creative achievement, and leaving us dependent on Roman copies of Greek originals.

What are the Main Types of Classical Greek Sculpture?

Classicist sculpture continued to be primarily connected with religion, and included the full panoply of Greek divinities and mythological figures. Thus, in addition to the twelve Olympian Gods and Goddesses - Zeus, Apollo, Poseidon, Demeter, Hera, Artemis, Hephaistos, Athene, Ares, Aphrodite, Hermes, and Hestia - sculptors carved small divinities such as, Dionysos, and his cycle of satyrs, nymphs and centaurs; Pluto and Persephone; Eros, Psyche and Ariadne; the Muses, Graces, Seasons, and Fates; as well equally heroes, including Achilles, Herakles, Theseus, Perseus, and others.

In improver to religious works, Classical artists also produced a range of 3-dimensional sporting figures, depicting athletes of various kinds, including discus-throwers, runners, wrestlers and chariot-racers. Curiously, however, historical sculpture as practiced in Egypt and Assyria was near unheard of in Aboriginal Greece. Of import events were depicted in mythological terms, rather than through factual narrative.

What are the Characteristics of Classical Greek Sculpture?

The main characteristics of Classical statuary concerned the accuracy of its anatomy and the realism of its opinion. Even so such improvements did non happen overnight. Thus, in Early on Classical Greek Sculpture (c.500-450), sculptors concentrated on making figures that were seen as moving through space, rather than merely standing in it. (A masterpiece of early on Classicism is Discobolus (c.450) by Myron.) Side by side, during the stage of High Classical Greek Sculpture (c.450-400), they applied a Platonic catechism of proportions to their figures. The human body was portrayed in an "ideal" form - an idea that was rekindled by Leonardo, Michelangelo and Raphael during the High Renaissance. In addition, High Classical sculptors developed the contrapposto stance, in which the subject's body weight is shifted onto a single foot, leaving the other slightly bent. An example is Doryphorus (c.440, marble copy in Museo Nazionale, Naples). More natural than previous poses, contrapposto for the first time allowed the influence of gravity to touch on the relationship between the subject's muscles and limbs. Invented by the Greeks, this type of posture was the foundation for European sculpture up until the 20th century. Finally, during the period of Tardily Classical Greek Sculpture, figures came to be seen every bit three-dimensional forms, which occupied and enclosed infinite. They could be viewed from any bending. This late stage of classicism (quaternary century) also produced the start free-standing female nudes. (Tardily Classical bronze is exemplified by Aphrodite of Knidos (350-40) past Praxiteles.)

Who are the Nigh Famous Classical Sculptors?

Another feature of Greek Classical sculpture is the emergence of named sculptors, although their works are known nigh entirely through later Roman copies. The greatest sculptors included: Kalamis (active 470-440), Pythagoras (active c.440-420), Phidias (488-431 BCE), Kresilas (c.480-410), Myron (agile 480-444), Polykleitos (active c.450-430), Callimachus (active 432-408), Skopas (active 395-350), Lysippos (c.395-305), Praxiteles (active 375-335), and Leochares (active 340-320).

What is the Near Famous Greek Architectural Sculpture from the Classical Menstruation?

It was during the fifth century (c.480-400) that Greek art (notably that of Athens) reached its highpoint. It witnessed the creation of the Athens Parthenon (447-422) - universally acknowledged as one of the corking masterpieces of Classical Greek sculpture, with its 500-foot frieze, hundreds of reliefs, and the colossal chryselephantine sculpture of Athene, past Phidias - as well as many other historic examples of Greek architecture, including: the Acropolis complex (550-404), the Temple of Zeus at Olympia (468-456), the Temple of Hephaistos (c.449), the Temple of Athena Nike (c.427), and the Theatre at Delphi (c.400). All these important buildings needed decorating with fresco painting and a wide range of sculpture, in marble, bronze and sometimes even chryselephantine goldsmithery. Where reliefs were needed to decorate specific architectural elements, sculptors created narratives incorporating stories from Greek mythology, like the Labours of Hercules, The Battle of the Lapiths and the Centaurs, and many others: see, for example, the famous Parthenon Frieze, likewise as the later on Bassae Frieze (420-400).

What are the Almost Famous Greek Statues from the Classical Period?

Here is a brusk list of the greatest sculptures from the Classical era:

- Leda and the Swan (500-450) by Timotheus.
- The Tyrannicides Hamodius Aristogeiton (c.477) by Critios.
- The Charioteer of Delphi (c.475) by unknown artist.
- Discobolus (c.450) past Myron.
- The Farnese Heracles (fifth Century) by unknown artist.
- Zeus or Poseidon (c.460) by Phidias.
- Riace Bronze A (c.450) by Phidias.
- "The Apollo Parnopius" (c.450) by Phidias.
- Athena Parthenos (c.447-5) by Phidias.
- Statue of Zeus (c.432) by Phidias.
- Wounded Amazon (440-430) by Polykleitos.
- Doryphorus (440) by Polykleitos.
- Statue of Zeus in the Temple of Zeus, at Olympia (c.432) by Phidias.
- Aphrodite (Venus Genetrix) (5th Century) by Callimachus.
- Youth of Antikythera (4th Century) by unknown creative person.
- Apollo Sauroktonos (4th Century) by Praxiteles.
- Hermes and the Infant Dionysos (4th Century) by Praxiteles.
- Aphrodite of Knidos (350-40) by Praxiteles.
- Apollo Belvedere (c.330) past Leochares.
- Artemis with a Hind (c.330) by Leochares.
- The Farnese Hercules (350-300) by Lysippos.
- The Victorious Youth (350-300) attributed to Lysippos.
- Apoxyomenos (Youth scraping down) (c.330) past Lysippos.

What Happened in the Greek Earth during the Hellenistic Period?

Hellenism, the outward spread of Greek culture to neighbouring areas of the eastern Mediterranean and beyond, traditionally begins with the expiry of Alexander the Cracking (323 BCE), when his huge empire was divided into three: Antigonus I (Monophthalmus) and the Antigonid dynasty took over Greece and Macedonia; Seleucus I (Nicator) and the Seleucid dynasty controlled Anatolia, Mesopotamia and Persia; and Ptolemy I (Soter) and the Ptolemaic dynasty ruled Egypt. Every bit well every bit Athens, cities like Alexandria in Arab republic of egypt, and Antioch, Pergamon and Miletus in Asia Small (Turkey), became wonders of the ancient world. Eventually, however, all these regions came under the control of the Romans - the last to autumn was Arab republic of egypt in 31 BCE, and it is this event which marks the end of Hellenism and the start of Roman sculpture. For a look beyond the borders of Hellenic republic, come across: Mesopotamian art (4500-539 BCE) and the Art of Ancient Persia (3500-330 BCE).

What Changes did Hellenistic Greek Sculpture Introduce?

Hellenistic Greek Sculpture introduced a number of changes to the type of art produced during the Classical era. To brainstorm with, monumental sculpture was no longer created primarily to serve an ascetic organized religion, simply became an of import promotional tool to reinforce autocratic regimes ready upward throughout the region (in Pergamon, in Alexandria, and and then on). In addition, as new centres of Greek culture sprang upwardly in Arab republic of egypt, Syrian arab republic, Anatolia and farther afield, there was a huge increase in demand for both architectural and monumental sculpture to decorate local temples and public places. This combination of increased demand and expansion of function led to sculpture becoming (like Greek Pottery) less of an art and more of an industry. As a result, designs became standardized, and quality declined.

Notwithstanding, plastic art became more interesting. This was because the general rising in demand led to a call for more diverseness. Thus sculptors broadened their subject-matter, and no longer restricted themselves to the arcadian heroics of Classical sculpture, merely depicted a wider range of personalities, moods and scenes. Acceptable subjects at present included: a wounded barbarian, a kid removing a thorn, a huntress, an erstwhile adult female, children, animals, and domestic scenes. Even caricatures appeared. For more details of this new fashion, encounter: Pergamene School of Hellenistic Sculpture (241-133 BCE).

Note: During the era of Hellenism, following the decease of Alexander the Great, the influence of Greek sculpture spread as far e equally India, where it had a major touch on Indian sculpture - notably the Greco-Buddhist statues of the Gandhara schoolhouse.

What are the Principal Characteristics of Hellenistic Greek Sculpture?

Near importantly, in that location was a major alter in aesthetics: in particular, Hellenism replaced the serene beauty of classicism with a more than emotional blazon of sculpture, which also included an intense realism. In this new era of expressionism, statues exuded energy and ability - run into, for example, The Farnese Bull, or The Winged Victory of Samothrace (220-190); human figures began to radiate suffering and emotion - come across, for example, The Dying Gaul (c.240 BCE) or Laocoon and His Sons (c.42-twenty). Genuine sensuality likewise appears, in works like Aphrodite, Pan and Eros (c.100), excavated at Delos, while for a more subtle version, come across the exquisite "Aphrodite of Cyrene" (c.100). In portraiture, Hellenism witnessed an increasing fascination with individual psychology: see, for example, the melancholic, introspective sculpture of Demosthenes (c.280) by Polyeuktos.

Some placidity endured, still, in sculptures like The Three Graces (2nd Century) and Venus de Milo (c.100).

If the High Classical period set the standard for the High Renaissance, the era of Hellenistic art was the prototype for sculptors of the Mannerist and Baroque movements. Not surprisingly, therefore, size became an important factor, with sculptors vying to create bigger and more than crawly sculptures: a process which culminated in the Colossus of Rhodes, past Chares of Lindos - a construction roughly the same size as the Statue of Freedom. It was after listed as 1 of the Vii Wonders of the Ancient World, by the Greek poet Antipater of Sidon.

Perhaps the most extraordinary monument to the "Baroque expressionism" of Greek Hellenistic sculpture was the huge Pergamon Chantry of Zeus, congenital over 30 years (c.180-150). (Encounter also: Hellenistic Statues and Reliefs.) The monument celebrated the crucial function of the Kings of Pergamon, as frontier guards of Greek civilisation in Asia Minor, and illustrates their numerous triumphs over barbarian forces encroaching from the e. 2d but to the Parthenon frieze, the Pergamon Chantry is the most all-encompassing example of Greek monumental sculpture known to fine art. The outer frieze depicts The battle of the Gods and the Giants in all its unrestrained violence, while the internal reliefs showroom a more controlled style of narrative, pointing to after developments in relief sculpture, such as Trajan's Column in Rome, 250 years subsequently: for more than details, come across: Relief Sculpture of Ancient Rome. For more about early on phases of Italian sculpture, painting and compages, see: Hellenistic Roman Fine art.

What are the Most Famous Greek Statues from the Hellenistic Period?

Here is a short selection of the greatest sculptures of the menstruation:

- Colossus of Rhodes (292-280 BCE) By Chares of Lindos.
- Crouching Hermaphrodite (tertiary Century) Louvre. Past unknown creative person.
- Menelaos with the Body of Patroklos (3rd Century) Past unknown artist.
- Dying Gaul (c.240 BCE) Musei Capitolini, Rome. By Epigonus.
- Ludovisi Gauls (c.240) National Museum of Rome. By unknown artist.
- Winged Victory of Samothrace (Nike) (220-190) Louvre. By unknown creative person.
- The Barberini Faun (c.220) Glyptothek, Munich. By unknown creative person.
- The Pergamon Altar (c.180-150) Pergamon, Asia Minor. By unknown artist.
- Jockey of Artemision (c.140) Archeological Museum, Athens. Unknown artist.
- "The Farnese Bull" (second Century) By Apollonius of Tralles.
- Sleeping Hermaphrodite (2nd Century BCE) Louvre. By unknown artist.
- The 3 Graces (2nd Century) Louvre. By unknown artist.
- "The Medici Venus" (150-100) Uffizi, Florence. By unknown artist.
- "Aphrodite of Cyrene" (c.100) Museo delle Terme, Rome. Past unknown artist.
- Borghese Gladiator (c.100) Louvre. By Agasias of Ephesus.
- Aphrodite, Pan and Eros (c.100) National Archeological Museum, Athens.
- "The Venus of Arles" (c.100) Louvre. By unknown artist.
- Venus de Milo (Aphrodite of Melos) (c.100) Louvre. Past Andros of Antioch.
- Spinario (Boy removing thorn from foot) (c.eighty) Palazzo dei Conservatori.
- Laocoon and His Sons (42-20 BCE) By Hagesander, Athenodoros, Polydorus.

Where are the Best Collections of Original Greek Sculpture?

Virtually surviving statues and reliefs from Classical Antiquity are Roman copies of Greek originals. These tin can be seen in many of the best fine art museums in Hellenic republic and Italian republic, as well every bit farther afield. Here is a short list of the best collections.

Greece
National Archeological Museum, Athens
Acropolis Museum, Athens
Archeological Museum, Olympia

ITALY
Vatican Museums
Musei Capitolini, Rome
Museo Nazionale Romano, Rome
Museo Archeologico Nazionale, Naples
Museo Nazionale, Calabria

EUROPE
Pergamon Museum, Berlin
Staatliche Museen, Berlin
Glyptothek, Munich
Louvre, Paris
Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, Copenhagen
Hermitage Museum, St Petersburg
British Museum, London

USA
Art Institute of Chicago
Carnegie Museum of Art (Pittsburgh)
J Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles
Los Angeles County Museum of Art
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

Our Knowledge of Ancient Greek Sculpture

Monumental sculpture in Ancient Greece started virtually 650 BCE, and by virtually 600 BCE was a major chemical element in Greek art with an established and growing marketplace. It supplied cult figures of gods, dedications in sanctuaries, monuments to stand in a higher place graves, architectural decorations, and eventually statues and reliefs for wealthy individual houses. Of all this relatively little remains: much has perished from natural causes, merely withal more was destroyed deliberately during medieval times. The reason was not ordinarily religious zeal, but the value of marble as raw material for lime and of bronze for scrap, so that in order to survive, sculpture had to be out of sight and reach.

Thus, what we now take is a sample unevenly distributed in time, type and quality. Architectural sculpture, while still in place, was not probable to be removed and, when the building collapsed, might exist buried under a mass of masonry. Independent reliefs, especially gravestones, were liable to fall down and, if covered over, be forgotten; and any slab carved in low relief could exist reused every bit a structural block. Gratuitous-continuing statues had poorer chances, since they were less likely to be subconscious sufficiently past debris, specially in populous places. Metal, of grade, was worth digging for and so less than a score of Greek bronzes have turned upwardly that are reasonably complete, several of them dredged upwardly from the sea. Equally for marble, works from the Archaic period survived best; being less admired it was less advisedly conserved by later Greeks and Romans and and so could be lost before the period of devastation set up in, and there is as well the big cache from the Acropolis of Athens where much of the statuary which the Persians broke in 480-79 was used as in-fill during the restoration that followed.

At the other end, Roman art provides us with a surfeit of copies of popular Greek sculptures from both the Classical and Hellenistic eras. These copies, some Late Hellenistic but more of them Roman, hinder too equally help the enjoyment and written report of Greek sculpture. Though the copyists fixed points by measurement, the points were much sparser than those used in modern practice and the intervening spaces and the details were carved freehand and usually without much intendance, every bit can exist seen when comparison different reproductions of the same original.

In general copies are fairly reliable for pose, but generally so harsh and insensitive in their handling of surface that they more often repel than interest the unprejudiced viewer; and with the finer examples there is the problem whether the copyists may non also have been artistic. Unfortunately very few first-charge per unit Classical stautues or ones from the Hellenistic period of Greek sculpture take survived in the original and those that are known through copies are far more numerous, so that copies are an essential reference in whatsoever stylistic survey of Greek sculpture.

Besides the surviving originals and copies in that location is another source of data in the remains of Greek and Latin literature. Pliny the Elderberry (the Roman writer, 23-79 CE) includes a continuous account of Greek sculpture in the Naturalis Historia he compiled around the heart of the outset century CE, while Pausanias a century later mentions many of the works he saw when travelling round for his Description of Greece. In add-on, there are casual references to sculptors and sculptures by other authors. Pausanias was quite uncritical, reporting faithfully what was told him only he was more interested in mythology than in art. Pliny's account, mainly second-hand, is compounded of colourful simply untrustworthy anecdotes, lists of sculptors and their most famous works, and a series of stylistic judgments that were probably taken from a Greek critic of the third century with a expert and sensitive knowledge of Classical sculpture (c.500-323 BCE) but non Archaic sculpture (650-500 BCE).

In practice our understanding of the development of Greek sculpture depends on the stylistic analysis of surviving works, supported by a miscellany of dates from historical records and inscriptions. The virtually important of these dates are the Persian capture of the Acropolis of Athens in 480, which gives a lower limit for the works they damaged; the completion of the Temple of Zeus at Olympia non later than 456; the sculptural ornamentation of the Parthenon, carried out in sequence from 447 to 432; the Nike of Paionios, commissioned nigh 420; the gravestone of Dexileos, killed at Corinth in 394; the building of the Mausoleum, which was going on in the 350s; the embellishment of the Great Altar at Pergamum, which is very probably of the early 2d century; the destruction of Delos in 69; and the dedication of the Ara Pacis Augustae at Rome in 9 BCE.

The present state of knowledge of ancient art in Greece is very uneven. For the Archaic menses, where at that place are no lists in Pliny to distract students, the examination of style has produced a reasonably credible evolution, equally information technology has too - in spite of Pliny - for the Classical menses till near the stop of the 5th century; only even here, experts are liable to disagree by equally much as twenty years over the dating of detail works. The fourth century is obscure, whatever the text-books say, and the Hellenistic period however more so, except perhaps towards its end. Though in time in that location should be more than precision about trends, information technology does not seem that nosotros shall ever have enough fabric to understand the personalities of Greek sculpture, non that that will deter the many students who remain devoted to their Natural History.

For more than about the influence of Greek sculpture on 20th century artists, see: Classical Revival in mod art (1900-30).

Sculptural Materials in Ancient Greece

The principal materials for Greek sculpture were stone (peculiarly marble) and statuary - limestone, terracotta and wood beingness much inferior - and there were several famous examples of ivory etching, notably the chryselephantine statues fabricated by Phidias from gilt sheeting and ivory mounted on a wooden core.

Marble, which was used from the first, occurs in several places in and effectually the Aegean, though non in Due south Italy and Sicily. The Greeks liked white, medium to fine-grained varieties, with much more sparkle than the Carrara (or Luna) later exploited by the Romans and yet familiar in the cemeteries of Western Europe. Limestone, which Classical archaeologists often call 'poras', is plentiful in most Greek lands and some of it is of very fine quality; it was the commonest stone for statues in the seventh century, but afterwards passed as reputable only for architectural sculpture in places like Sicily, where marble was too expensive. Terracotta too was an economic material for architectural work, particularly antefixes and acroteria. Woods, of course, had petty chance of surviving, and to judge by ancient records was never in regular employ for finished sculpture, though possibly the molds for bronze statues were formed on wooden figures. Statuary was not of import till the second half of the sixth century, when the hammering of canvass metallic was replaced by hollow casting, but by the early on fifth century it was the preferred medium for most types of costless-standing statue (though not for reliefs and architectural sculpture). Chryselephantine statues, which were too expensive and peradventure also also easily damaged to exist common, go dorsum at to the lowest degree to the center years of the sixth century: they were appreciated specially every bit cult images in temples. At that place are other instances, also exceptional, of combinations of materials: some large statues were 'acrolithie', that is of stone for the mankind and wood for the other parts, and occasionally the hair of marble statues was completed in stucco.

Greek sculpture was coloured, as was virtually sculpture till the Renaissance, and indeed if the ancient marble statues which were institute and admired at that fourth dimension had kept their pigment, the more conservative of us would probably even so expect colouring on sculpture. Of the details of the Greek painting of marble, as well as limestone and woods, our data is patchy. For the sixth century, the finds on the Acropolis of Athens give expert samples and there are later on sarcophagi from Sidon and Etruria where the colours are well preserved, merely commonly we are lucky if we accept traces even of the boundaries of painted areas. On terracotta the pigment has survived much better, since it was fired on, but unfortunately because of the firing the range of colours was express and rather crude. There is the difficulty too that through chemical action some colours may have inverse - in particular blues have sometimes turned into greens - and ruby-red, which is the nigh persistent paint, may sometimes accept served every bit an undercoat. Still ane may assert that eyes, hair, lips and nipples were regularly (and cheeks sometimes) painted, that female mankind was left in the natural white of the marble or only tinted lightly, that male flesh was often coloured a warm brown, and that drapery was usually painted over completely unless for a garment was left white for contrast. Mostly, until the fourth century, at that place was a continuous progress towards subtler and more natural colouring, though later it became commoner for hair to exist gilded.

For more almost painting techniques in Ancient Greece, please meet: Classical Greek Painting (c.500-323) and Hellenistic Greek Painting (323-31 BCE).

With this taste for polychromy it is non surprising that the Greeks were set up to add such accessories equally earrings and weapons in metal - how extensively may exist judged past the holes drilled for their zipper. The result of all this was to make ancient sculpture much more vivacious, near obviously in giving sight to the eyes. It is harder to calculate the furnishings in drapery, simply sometimes the limerick must take been clarified or strengthened past contrasting colour, every bit on the Nike of Paionios (c.420 BCE), where one thigh was naked and the other covered. On reliefs, the background was painted red or bluish, and on pediments, blueish. As for bronze, Greek taste preferred to keep it shiny, and patination (greenish or brown sheen) was a sign of neglect, although in the Roman period some collectors considered patina a certificate of artifact. Eyes were regularly filled with paste or some other substance, and lips and nipples were often inlaid with copper or silver, simply experts still dispute whether pilus and other areas were darkened artificially or even painted. And then when ane looks at Greek sculpture it is worth making the effort to call back that there was more to it than form.

Greek Sculptural Methods

For reliefs it is natural to sketch the subject on the prepared surface and to work from that sketch, but until well into the Hellenistic period Greek marble sculptors did non use detailed models when etching statues, or so it can reasonably be inferred from finished and unfinished works. First, it is non till the final century BCE that at that place are traces of any organisation of pointing - the method by which positions determined on a model are transferred precisely to the block from which the final statue is to be carved - and even then the points were far enough apart for large areas to exist left to freehand carving. Secondly, in pedimental sculpture, where at to the lowest degree the human relationship of the figures had to exist planned accurately before-hand, the various sculptors of the team could develop the drape of their figures as they chose; this is very clear in the due west pediment of the Temple of Zeus at Olympia, where on some figures the handling of folds is old-fashioned and on others discordantly progressive.

From the identity of style with that of marble statues, bronze statues too must usually have depended on carving, presumably here of the preliminary figure, and it is hardly earlier the second century that there is whatsoever suggestion in finished work of that fluid kind of modelling which is encouraged by soft clay or wax. More surprisingly there is no such plastic modelling in terracottas either. Evidently the Greek sculptural tradition was founded on and fixed by carving.

Surviving originals which were abandoned at various stages of progress prove that the normal process of etching a marble statue was not to finish 1 part at a time (as usually happens with pointing from a scale model), simply to piece of work round the figure stage by stage. This meant that there was non much that the sculptor-could consul safely to an assistant and that he was continually reminded of the effect of the whole as he dealt with the detail. Presumably he began past drawing the outlines of his figure on all 4 sides of the cake. This would have been practicable plenty with the unproblematic, four-square poses that were regular for statuary till the 4th century.

Next he removed the surplus stone to within an inch or so of the intended final surface, using showtime the choice-hammer and the drill so increasingly the dial. In that location followed the rough shaping of the figure with the point, a fine dial which can be recognized by the pitting it leaves, and awkward cavities (such every bit the space between an arm and the body or deep folds of drapery) were partly hollowed out past the drill. The drill, which had a round chisel for its scrap, was used in two ways, either to bore single holes or serial of holes, or (as a 'running' drill) travelling obliquely forward to cut a furrow. The method of the running drill seems to take been invented piffling, if at all, earlier than the 370s BCE and, since information technology saved labour, soon became very popular.

The next and about decisive phase of the carving was the detailed modelling of the surface past chisels of various types - the claw chisel (which seems to have been invented around 560 BCE), the flat chisel and the round chisel. These chisels were used both obliquely and vertically, as was the point, and ordinarily with short, gentle strokes.

Afterward the modelling the surface was smoothed with rasps of suitable shapes and gauge, then came a finer smoothing with abrasives, probably emery fries and powder followed by powdered pumice. This smoothing did not produce the high gloss of much Roman and recent sculpture. For a gloss finish, the surface needs to be polished with effectively abrasives, such as putty powder or rouge. Finally the statue was painted - from 500 BCE onwards, in the encaustic technique - and any metal accessories were attached.

For reliefs the procedure was much the aforementioned. Kickoff the subject must accept been sketched on the prepared block. And so the outline was cutting out, on deeper reliefs often by a drill, and after that the betoken, chisel, rasp and abrasives were used in sequence. Generally Greek sculptors of reliefs carved no part much further back from the forepart plane than was required past the effective modelling of that part. So the background tends not to be level and the depth at which figures and parts of figures are set is governed more past optical than natural relationships.

For pedimental figures practice varied. Sometimes the procedure was that used for gratis-standing statues, though frequently the back was unfinished, only sometimes - as with the bodies of the Centaurs at 0lympia - they were treated much like high relief. The standard of finish was very high and all visible tool marks of one stage were expected to be cleared away in the adjacent, though there were bad-mannered places where abrasives or the rasp could not be used properly and very occasionally a tool dug too deep on an open surface. Taste in finishing varied, but was less exacting as time went on. On reliefs, backgrounds and big neutral areas like seats were frequently rasped, but non smoothed farther by abrasives. In the fourth century, some sculptors chose to go out drapery only rasped, for contrast of texture with the fully smoothed flesh; and in bottom pieces there was an increasing tendency to negligence. Nevertheless, the difference betwixt even mediocre Greek carving and the average Roman re-create is obvious; the copyists only occasionally took problem over the chisel work. Incidentally, a Greek sculptor typically took from 6 to ix months to carve a full-size marble statue.

Bronze statues are rare, so it is much more difficult to deduce the methods by which they were fabricated, compared with marble statues. Thus the summary account that follows may be wrong in parts. During the seventh and the early sixth centuries some sizable statues were synthetic in the 'sphyrelaton' technique - that is, thin sheets of statuary hammered into shape and fastened with nails to a wooden frame or cadre - merely the results were non satisfactory; and though pocket-sized figurines were cast solid in molds, solid casting was likewise expensive (fifty-fifty if practicable) for large figures. So, probably about the middle of the sixth century, a process of hollow casting, which had been used for some time for smallish objects, was borrowed and adult for full-size statues. The Greeks were non advanced enough in their metallurgy to construct large frames as rigid as is needed for sand-box casting and then they must accept depended on a 'lost wax' process.

The regular sequence of work seems to have been something like this. First the sculptor prepared his preliminary effigy in full and precise detail; the material is likely to have been wax, or perhaps clay or forest, only anyway the effect suggests carving rather than modelling of the surface. Then this figure was coated with clay (or possibly plaster) to make a mold. Side by side the mold and the preliminary figure had to exist separated, and here more uncertainty intrudes. The following stage required the mold to have been slit open up, and also it was usual to cast large statues in several parts. If and then the cloth of the preliminary effigy was soft - that is wax or clay - information technology could be prised or dug away or perhaps run or washed out; or else the effigy was removed intact and, since under-cutting was frequent, particularly in folds of drapery, this ways either that the figure had already been dissected into many separable pieces or that an equally complex dissection was now performed on the mold; although if the mold was so dissected, well-nigh of the smaller pieces must accept been reassembled before the next stage. In this, the open up mold was lined with wax to any thickness was wanted for the bronze wall of the finished statue. In plough the wax lining was lined with clay to form a core, which was connected to the mold past metal pegs (chaplets), so that mold and core would keep their relative positions when the wax was melted out. This clay core may have been slapped on moist, or poured in liquid, and depending on the process used the mold was reassembled in its complete parts after or before the making of the cadre. If the mold was of plaster an extra operation was necessary, since the plaster had to be removed carefully from the wax-covered cadre and replaced by a thick blanket of clay. (Note: The process described so far is that of indirect 'lost wax' casting, but Greek sculptors sometimes used the less economical direct procedure instead: here the preliminary figure, which is of clay and also serves equally a core, is itself coated with a layer of wax and this layer, which is finished in full detail, is enclosed in a casing of clay.)

All was now gear up for the firing. The molds with their cores were warmed and so that the wax melted out and molten bronze was encounter the cavities left by the wax; but since air-dried clay will not accept molten metal without at least buckling, one assumes that after the wax had melted the molds and cores were fired to the temperature required for terracotta or even higher, and the metal was run in while they were still at this heat. Then, when everything had cooled, the bronze casting was freed by breaking off the outer mold or coating. It was non, of class, necessary to option out all the core and in fact lumps of core accept been institute notwithstanding surviving inside bronze statues.

At that place was withal plenty of work to exist done. At this phase the casting has a granular skin, which needed scraping off; cracks were plugged and faults made skilful by cutting out and filling with strips of metallic plate (the rectangular depressions visible on some surviving statues are such cuttings from which the fillings have fallen out). The separately molded pieces were joined together, by tongue and groove if large, or past welding or soldering if small. Details were engraved, eyes were inserted and fixed, often lips and nipples were inlaid in copper or some other metal, and the whole surface was glassy thoroughly to conceal the edges of joins and patchings and to produce a proper shine. The smoothen was maintained, as records bear witness, by applications of oil or resin, and possibly bitumen. Altogether the making of a statuary statue was a complicated job and the risks of failure in firing the mold and founding the metal must take been serious, it was the greater cost of the materials that made bronze statues dearer than statues of marble.

Some statues, especially smallish ones, were put on high pedestals or even columns or piers, but the most normal type of Greek base was relatively depression, rectangular and made from marble. In the fifth century, for a full-size statue the base was usually rather less than a foot high and its surface might be finished but with the signal, though later there was a tendency to produce something taller and more ornate. Standing marble statues were carved with a small plinth round the feet and this was let into the base and stock-still with lead, ofttimes untidily. Bronze statues were pegged. See besides: Greek Metalwork.

The setting was normally in the open up air and, since by the fifth century Greek sculptors were sophisticated plenty to make optical corrections for the bending of viewing, 1 assumes they also took account of the nature of the lighting. These very of import factors are oft ignored in the exhibiting of Greek sculpture in both old and new museums, where statues are more often than not set too high above the ground and their illumination tends to exist one-sided and oblique. Nor is the arrangement altogether correct, in long rows or studied groupings; the Greek habit was to consider each statue equally an independent entity and to site it in some conveniently vacant place without much business organization for its aesthetic relationship to neighbouring statues or buildings.

There is i more than warning. Well-nigh ancient statues have been mutilated in the passage of time. From the sixteenth to the nineteenth century information technology was usual to restore at least the more obvious deficiencies and though the current fashion abhors any restoration, many pieces are still exhibited which accept been restored, sometimes misleadingly. There is a fairly reliable dominion for distinguishing what is original in a marble statue and what is non. When two pieces of stone are joined, it is very hard to disguise the line of the join. At present a natural break leaves an irregular edge and, if a line of joining is irregular, the two pieces can be taken as belonging to each other. But since ane needs a regular surface to fit a new slice onto another, a directly joining line shows that one of these pieces is new and i may suspect that the jagged surface of an quondam interruption has been cut downward and smoothed to brand a clean fit for a replacement. Occasionally such replacements were made in ancient times, but generally a straight join is evidence of modern restoration in modern times. The National Museum at Naples, which inherited the magnificent Renaissance collection of the Farnese family, is an admirable place for practising this test of authenticity.

NOTE: For later on sculptors inspired by the sculptural carvings of ancient Greece, please meet: Classicism in Fine art (800 onwards).

Uses For Ancient Greek Sculpture

The Greeks used statues for so-called cult figures of deities, dedications, monuments on graves and architectural decoration, just it was not until the Hellenistic period that they acquired or commissioned more than statuettes for individual enjoyment. The uses of reliefs were similar, except that they did not serve as cult figures.

Cult statues, sometimes colossal, were insufficiently rare. Normally one such statue, of the patron god or goddess, stood inside the inner area of a temple, but the term 'cult statue' is misleading. These sculptures were regarded every bit works of human craftsmanship, illustrating merely not embodying the deity. Thus, although admired, they were not worshipped.

Dedications were gear up up in sanctuaries and other public places, by private persons or past communities, to celebrate victory in able-bodied competitions or war, to pay a vow or a fine, to limited gratitude for success or safety, and to annunciate a donor. Others, from the fourth century onwards, included statues commemorating distinguished citizens. Some popular sites became crowded with these dedicatory statues, equally is very evident from the surviving bases in the sanctuary of Apollo at Delphi. Reliefs were usually less imposing and cheaper; they vary widely in size and quality and were specially popular as votive offerings, like the painted wooden or terracotta plaques offered by the poor. Much the nigh numerous class of statues were dedications.

Grave monuments were some other of import class of sculpture. Well-nigh of them were in relief. But those who could beget it sometimes preferred a statue, especially in the Archaic period. Though the Greeks respected the graves of their dead, the memorials above them satisfied family feeling and ostentation rather than religious necessities; so in a public emergency grave sculptures could be demolished to provide stone for fortifications, and at Athens on two occasions funerary expenditure was restricted successfully by civil legislation. Over again in the siting and choice of monuments not much detect was taken of those on neighbouring plots. The main cemeteries ran along the roads out-side the metropolis gates, with the expressionless competing (sometimes explicitly) for the notice of every passer-past.

In Greek architecture, especially for temples, sculpture in the round could exist used for acroteria and antefixes, and spouts ofttimes took the shape of lion heads. Further, the figures of pedimental sculpture soon came to stand clear of their background, though in composition and poses they were still shut to reliefs. Other uses for architectural sculpture are plant among foreign peoples who admired and followed Greek fine art; in detail, statues were sometimes put past Etruscans forth the ridge of a temple roof and by Lycians in the intervals of the raised colonnade embellishing an aristocratic tomb.

Most of these uses of sculpture were connected with sanctuaries and graves, only even if religion permeated Greek life, Greek art was in no significant sense religious. Representations of gods and goddesses, who were conceived as merely too fully human being, gave them their appropriate maturity and attributes - so Zeus was regularly disguised and Athena unremarkably wore helmet and custodianship. Just Greek artists, different Egyptian, were not cramped by hieratic regulations concerning how gods and people should be depicted. The standard by which an artist's work was judged was its aesthetic value inside, of course, the limits immune past public opinion. This limitation applied especially to sculpture - and to statues more than reliefs - since sculpture of any issue was prepare only in public places. That presumably is why the showtime statue of a nude female did non occur till the centre of the quaternary century, though in vase painting and for figurines (and indeed in relief sculpture) nudes had been accustomed long before. Only painted vases and figurines were made for private customers and, even if defended in a sanctuary, they were not exhibited clearly. Sculptors merely became gratuitous of such restraint in the Hellenistic period, when public stance had changed and they were at final enabled to exploit without disguise their own or their customers' tastes for the un-heroic, the erotic and the sentimental.

It is much the same with sculptural types and subjects. Throughout the Primitive period the two principal types were the 'kouros' (standing nude male) and the 'kore' (standing draped female), and these could serve as cult statues, or dedications, or grave monuments. Then also to a bottom degree did the Classical successors of the kouros and kore. Some gods and heroes had a feature attribute to identify them - Asklepios a snake, or Heracles his club - but generally till the Hellenistic menstruum the subjects of statues were unspecialized types, and convenient vehicles for artistic expression. For instance the kouros is a regular type of statue on Archaic graves, simply at that place is no good reason to think that these expensive sepulchral monuments were put upward only for very immature men who had not lived long enough to abound a beard. Over again, in the later sixth century the standard dedication on the Acropolis at Athens was a kore, but because of its dress this figure did not represent Athena, to whom it was dedicated, nor because of its gender the donor. It is interesting that 'agalma', i of the 2 common Greek words for a statue, had an original significant of 'a thing to accept pleasure in'.

Reliefs, of course, where several figures are included, require some coherent bailiwick to avoid dullness, only in the tablets and friezes of temples, the subject, commonly mythological, was not often i peculiarly advisable to the patron deity. The boxing of the Lapiths and the Centaurs, which occupies the west pediment of the Temple of Zeus at Olympia and the s set of metope tablets of the Parthenon at Athens, took place far away in Thessaly and was a pocket-sized incident in Greek myth; simply it gave artists a convenient excuse for practising their skill in human beefcake, both male and female, and varying the upshot with horses. Grave reliefs developed their own conventions of domestic scenes of pleasure or grief and votive reliefs oft depicted the appropriate divinities with worshippers budgeted them, merely the figures of the dead or the donors remained standard types. Even in portraits, or what pass as portraits, it was non until the Hellenistic menstruation that sculptors tried seriously for a speaking likeness of their sitter. It is difficult to avoid the determination that in the choice and even more in the treatment of types and subjects the dominant motives were artful, and and then ane may with good conscience savour Greek sculpture as art without worrying about any esoteric meaning.

Origins of Greek Sculpture

During the eighth century BCE, at to the lowest degree in Crete, some uncomplicated reliefs of soft limestone prove an Oriental and specially Syrian manner, only this was a fake start and is ignored here. Greek sculpture as we know it began with the then-called Daedalic style, which appeared towards the middle of the seventh century.

The problem of origins is best separate into 2 - how did the Greeks become the idea of large statues of rock and how did they get the style? To the first question there is a set answer: at that fourth dimension Greeks were certainly visiting Syrian arab republic, which had some stone sculpture, and mayhap Egypt, which had more than. On the source of the mode at that place are various theories.

The one almost widely held is that early on Greek sculpture was based on Egyptian sculpture- considering of the pose (especially of the male person figure), the wig-like coiffure, and perhaps the technique of carving difficult stone. Yet the Greek male pose differs from the Egyptian in tilt and stance, while the coiffure was familiar in Syrian art as well, Moreover, Greek masons may already have been used to marble, and Egyptian forms are total and rounded and to some caste individualized, while Daedalic figures have a spare and unnaturally simplified structure.

Another notion, that the Daedalic style of stone sculpture continued an before Greek style of carving in wood, has few supporters, since the Greek figurines of the early on seventh and tardily eighth centuries are radically unlike from Daedalic in manner and and so too are the very rare stone carvings that may be of the same date.

If these objections are good, then the style of Greek sculpture cannot have been derived from that of any sculptural schoolhouse. And in origin, it may be simply an enlargement of the style of the gimmicky Daedalic figurines of dirt, which appeared suddenly at the beginning of the seventh century, whose style and technique appears to have derived from a class of cheap Syrian plaques and figurines. Still, not anybody can breadbasket then humble an ancestry for and so high an art.

If, though, Egyptian art had no direct function in the cosmos of Greek sculpture, it may yet have had some influence later. The kouros in New York, which was sculpted almost 600 BCE, conforms in some points to the standard filigree used past the Egyptians for plotting out a statue and this may not be coincidence. Nevertheless, the sculptor of the New York kouros was an eccentric, and more than orthodox kouroi of the time testify no such conformity. By 600 BCE, sculpture - like other fine arts of European Hellenic republic - was well established, and what borrowings it made from outside were only coincidental.

It may have been different in the East Greek region, along the westward coast of Turkey, where a new and distinct fashion appears at the outset of the sixth century, perhaps inspired past ivory statuettes from the Syrian region. But equally more than early on sculpture is discovered, the problems or origins and influences will no doubt become more than complicated.

• For more virtually the evolution and chronology of the visual arts, meet: History of Art.
• For more virtually reliefs, friezes and statues in Aboriginal Hellenic republic, see: Visual Arts Encyclopedia.

---

ENCYCLOPEDIA OF ART and CLASSICAL ANTIQUITIES
© visual-arts-cork.com. All rights reserved.

mcbroomsuppen1991.blogspot.com

Source: http://www.visual-arts-cork.com/antiquity/greek-sculpture.htm

Share this post